Review



tgfb1 elisas il 12 levels  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems tgfb1 elisas il 12 levels
    Fig. 4. TGFBR2KO armored UCARTM1 shows resistance to inhibitory effects of <t>TGFB1.</t> (A) Schematic representation of the non-alloreactive CAR T cell with TRAC and TGFBR2 knockout with TALEN (UCARTM1∆TGFBR2). (B) Functional phenotyping of TGFBR2 knockout edited UCARTM1 compared to the unedited UCARTM1 via flow cytometry analysis of pSMAD2/3 staining in the presence of TGFB1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of CD25+ cells present in UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 following activation with MUC1 recombinant protein, in the presence or absence of TGFB1 (n = 2). Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired t test. (D) Proliferation assay for MUC1 recombinant protein activated UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 in the presence or absence of TGFB1 at days 0, 4, 6, 8, and 11 (n = 2 technical replicates per time point). Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA. (E) Design of in vivo experiment and individual tumor growth comparison of tumors treated intravenously with 5 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 4 to 5 per cohort) for donor 1. Experiment repeated with donor 2 is shown in the Supplementary Materials. Two- way ANOVA was performed for comparisons over time for tumor growth. (F) Design of in vivo experiment, individual tumor growth comparison of tumors, and (G) Kaplan- Meier survival analysis of cohorts treated intratumorally with 2 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 (n = 4), UCARTM1 (n = 4), NTD (n = 2), or PBS (n = 3). Each point represents a biological replicate for (E) to (G). Statistical significance was calculated using mixed-effects analysis comparisons over time for tumor growth and the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05. (H) TGFB1 ELISA analysis of HCC70-GFP tumors averaging 50 to 100, 250, 450, and 600 mm3 per mm3 of tumor (n = 2 to 6). Each point represents a biological replicate. Treatments were done using 2 × 106 or 5 × 106 CAR+ cells as indicated on each in vivo design.
    Tgfb1 Elisas Il 12 Levels, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 183 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tgfb1+elisas+il+12+levels/Human+LAP+(TGF-beta+1)+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pm39213364-378-4-19
    Average 95 stars, based on 183 article reviews
    tgfb1 elisas il 12 levels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Multi-armored allogeneic MUC1 CAR T cells enhance efficacy and safety in triple-negative breast cancer."

    Article Title: Multi-armored allogeneic MUC1 CAR T cells enhance efficacy and safety in triple-negative breast cancer.

    Journal: Science advances

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn9857

    Fig. 4. TGFBR2KO armored UCARTM1 shows resistance to inhibitory effects of TGFB1. (A) Schematic representation of the non-alloreactive CAR T cell with TRAC and TGFBR2 knockout with TALEN (UCARTM1∆TGFBR2). (B) Functional phenotyping of TGFBR2 knockout edited UCARTM1 compared to the unedited UCARTM1 via flow cytometry analysis of pSMAD2/3 staining in the presence of TGFB1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of CD25+ cells present in UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 following activation with MUC1 recombinant protein, in the presence or absence of TGFB1 (n = 2). Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired t test. (D) Proliferation assay for MUC1 recombinant protein activated UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 in the presence or absence of TGFB1 at days 0, 4, 6, 8, and 11 (n = 2 technical replicates per time point). Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA. (E) Design of in vivo experiment and individual tumor growth comparison of tumors treated intravenously with 5 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 4 to 5 per cohort) for donor 1. Experiment repeated with donor 2 is shown in the Supplementary Materials. Two- way ANOVA was performed for comparisons over time for tumor growth. (F) Design of in vivo experiment, individual tumor growth comparison of tumors, and (G) Kaplan- Meier survival analysis of cohorts treated intratumorally with 2 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 (n = 4), UCARTM1 (n = 4), NTD (n = 2), or PBS (n = 3). Each point represents a biological replicate for (E) to (G). Statistical significance was calculated using mixed-effects analysis comparisons over time for tumor growth and the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05. (H) TGFB1 ELISA analysis of HCC70-GFP tumors averaging 50 to 100, 250, 450, and 600 mm3 per mm3 of tumor (n = 2 to 6). Each point represents a biological replicate. Treatments were done using 2 × 106 or 5 × 106 CAR+ cells as indicated on each in vivo design.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 4. TGFBR2KO armored UCARTM1 shows resistance to inhibitory effects of TGFB1. (A) Schematic representation of the non-alloreactive CAR T cell with TRAC and TGFBR2 knockout with TALEN (UCARTM1∆TGFBR2). (B) Functional phenotyping of TGFBR2 knockout edited UCARTM1 compared to the unedited UCARTM1 via flow cytometry analysis of pSMAD2/3 staining in the presence of TGFB1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of CD25+ cells present in UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 following activation with MUC1 recombinant protein, in the presence or absence of TGFB1 (n = 2). Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired t test. (D) Proliferation assay for MUC1 recombinant protein activated UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 in the presence or absence of TGFB1 at days 0, 4, 6, 8, and 11 (n = 2 technical replicates per time point). Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA. (E) Design of in vivo experiment and individual tumor growth comparison of tumors treated intravenously with 5 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 4 to 5 per cohort) for donor 1. Experiment repeated with donor 2 is shown in the Supplementary Materials. Two- way ANOVA was performed for comparisons over time for tumor growth. (F) Design of in vivo experiment, individual tumor growth comparison of tumors, and (G) Kaplan- Meier survival analysis of cohorts treated intratumorally with 2 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 (n = 4), UCARTM1 (n = 4), NTD (n = 2), or PBS (n = 3). Each point represents a biological replicate for (E) to (G). Statistical significance was calculated using mixed-effects analysis comparisons over time for tumor growth and the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05. (H) TGFB1 ELISA analysis of HCC70-GFP tumors averaging 50 to 100, 250, 450, and 600 mm3 per mm3 of tumor (n = 2 to 6). Each point represents a biological replicate. Treatments were done using 2 × 106 or 5 × 106 CAR+ cells as indicated on each in vivo design.

    Techniques Used: Knock-Out, Functional Assay, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Activation Assay, Recombinant, Proliferation Assay, In Vivo, Comparison, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Fig. 5. PD1KO/IL-12KI and TGFBR2KO armored CAR T cells clear tumors within weeks without relapse with less CAR T cell expansion. (A) Schematic representation of the non- alloreactive CAR T cell with TRAC, PDCD1, and TGFBR2 knockouts and IL-12 knock-in. (B) Proliferation assay of MUC1 recombinant protein–activated UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12 and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2 with or without TGFB1 (n = 2 technical replicates per time point). Two-way ANOVA was performed for statistical significance over time. (C) Cytotoxic assay of T47D cells cocultured with NTD, UCARTM1, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2in the presence of TGFB1 with a 10-to-1 E:T ratio. CAR T cells were rechallenged after 24 hours (n = 3). Each point represents a technical replicate. Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired t test. (D) Design of in vivo experiment. (E) Tumor growth curve for cohorts intravenously treated with 5 million UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 5 to 6 per cohort) and (F) flow cytometry analysis of PB collected from all cohorts, 40 days after treatment for number and percent of hCD45+ cells. Two-way ANOVA was performed for comparisons for tumor growth, and ordinary one-way ANOVA was performed to determine the statistical significance for (F). (G) Color mapping of tumor clearance and inflammation in the mam- mary glands of UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12- and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2-treated cohorts (n = 5 and 6, consecutively) and representative dissection images of tumor cell injected (inj.) and no tumor cell injected mammary fat pad (MFP) (Control; Ctrl) of one animal each. (H) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of cohorts treated with UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 4 to 6 per cohort). Each point represents a biological replicate for (E) to (G). Statistical significance was calculated using the log-rank Mantel-Cox test in (H). *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.000, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05. All treatments were done using 5 × 106 CAR+ cells.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 5. PD1KO/IL-12KI and TGFBR2KO armored CAR T cells clear tumors within weeks without relapse with less CAR T cell expansion. (A) Schematic representation of the non- alloreactive CAR T cell with TRAC, PDCD1, and TGFBR2 knockouts and IL-12 knock-in. (B) Proliferation assay of MUC1 recombinant protein–activated UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12 and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2 with or without TGFB1 (n = 2 technical replicates per time point). Two-way ANOVA was performed for statistical significance over time. (C) Cytotoxic assay of T47D cells cocultured with NTD, UCARTM1, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2in the presence of TGFB1 with a 10-to-1 E:T ratio. CAR T cells were rechallenged after 24 hours (n = 3). Each point represents a technical replicate. Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired t test. (D) Design of in vivo experiment. (E) Tumor growth curve for cohorts intravenously treated with 5 million UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 5 to 6 per cohort) and (F) flow cytometry analysis of PB collected from all cohorts, 40 days after treatment for number and percent of hCD45+ cells. Two-way ANOVA was performed for comparisons for tumor growth, and ordinary one-way ANOVA was performed to determine the statistical significance for (F). (G) Color mapping of tumor clearance and inflammation in the mam- mary glands of UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12- and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2-treated cohorts (n = 5 and 6, consecutively) and representative dissection images of tumor cell injected (inj.) and no tumor cell injected mammary fat pad (MFP) (Control; Ctrl) of one animal each. (H) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of cohorts treated with UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 4 to 6 per cohort). Each point represents a biological replicate for (E) to (G). Statistical significance was calculated using the log-rank Mantel-Cox test in (H). *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.000, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05. All treatments were done using 5 × 106 CAR+ cells.

    Techniques Used: Knock-In, Proliferation Assay, Recombinant, In Vivo, Flow Cytometry, Dissection, Injection, Control

    Related Articles

    Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay:

    Article Title: Multi-armored allogeneic MUC1 CAR T cells enhance efficacy and safety in triple-negative breast cancer.
    Article Snippet: .. IL- 12, IFNG, and TGFB1 ELISAs IL- 12 levels were measured with Quantikine ELISA Human IL- 12 p70 Immunoassay (R&D Systems, no. D1200) using 30 μl of blood. .. IFNG levels in blood serum were determined using the Human IFN- Gamma Quantikine Kit (R&D Systems, no. SIF50) following the manufacturer’s instructions using 1 μl of blood.



    Similar Products

    95
    R&D Systems tgfb1 elisas il 12 levels
    Fig. 4. TGFBR2KO armored UCARTM1 shows resistance to inhibitory effects of <t>TGFB1.</t> (A) Schematic representation of the non-alloreactive CAR T cell with TRAC and TGFBR2 knockout with TALEN (UCARTM1∆TGFBR2). (B) Functional phenotyping of TGFBR2 knockout edited UCARTM1 compared to the unedited UCARTM1 via flow cytometry analysis of pSMAD2/3 staining in the presence of TGFB1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of CD25+ cells present in UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 following activation with MUC1 recombinant protein, in the presence or absence of TGFB1 (n = 2). Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired t test. (D) Proliferation assay for MUC1 recombinant protein activated UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 in the presence or absence of TGFB1 at days 0, 4, 6, 8, and 11 (n = 2 technical replicates per time point). Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA. (E) Design of in vivo experiment and individual tumor growth comparison of tumors treated intravenously with 5 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 4 to 5 per cohort) for donor 1. Experiment repeated with donor 2 is shown in the Supplementary Materials. Two- way ANOVA was performed for comparisons over time for tumor growth. (F) Design of in vivo experiment, individual tumor growth comparison of tumors, and (G) Kaplan- Meier survival analysis of cohorts treated intratumorally with 2 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 (n = 4), UCARTM1 (n = 4), NTD (n = 2), or PBS (n = 3). Each point represents a biological replicate for (E) to (G). Statistical significance was calculated using mixed-effects analysis comparisons over time for tumor growth and the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05. (H) TGFB1 ELISA analysis of HCC70-GFP tumors averaging 50 to 100, 250, 450, and 600 mm3 per mm3 of tumor (n = 2 to 6). Each point represents a biological replicate. Treatments were done using 2 × 106 or 5 × 106 CAR+ cells as indicated on each in vivo design.
    Tgfb1 Elisas Il 12 Levels, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tgfb1+elisas+il+12+levels/Human+LAP+(TGF-beta+1)+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pm39213364-378-4-19
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tgfb1 elisas il 12 levels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Fig. 4. TGFBR2KO armored UCARTM1 shows resistance to inhibitory effects of TGFB1. (A) Schematic representation of the non-alloreactive CAR T cell with TRAC and TGFBR2 knockout with TALEN (UCARTM1∆TGFBR2). (B) Functional phenotyping of TGFBR2 knockout edited UCARTM1 compared to the unedited UCARTM1 via flow cytometry analysis of pSMAD2/3 staining in the presence of TGFB1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of CD25+ cells present in UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 following activation with MUC1 recombinant protein, in the presence or absence of TGFB1 (n = 2). Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired t test. (D) Proliferation assay for MUC1 recombinant protein activated UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 in the presence or absence of TGFB1 at days 0, 4, 6, 8, and 11 (n = 2 technical replicates per time point). Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA. (E) Design of in vivo experiment and individual tumor growth comparison of tumors treated intravenously with 5 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 4 to 5 per cohort) for donor 1. Experiment repeated with donor 2 is shown in the Supplementary Materials. Two- way ANOVA was performed for comparisons over time for tumor growth. (F) Design of in vivo experiment, individual tumor growth comparison of tumors, and (G) Kaplan- Meier survival analysis of cohorts treated intratumorally with 2 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 (n = 4), UCARTM1 (n = 4), NTD (n = 2), or PBS (n = 3). Each point represents a biological replicate for (E) to (G). Statistical significance was calculated using mixed-effects analysis comparisons over time for tumor growth and the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05. (H) TGFB1 ELISA analysis of HCC70-GFP tumors averaging 50 to 100, 250, 450, and 600 mm3 per mm3 of tumor (n = 2 to 6). Each point represents a biological replicate. Treatments were done using 2 × 106 or 5 × 106 CAR+ cells as indicated on each in vivo design.

    Journal: Science advances

    Article Title: Multi-armored allogeneic MUC1 CAR T cells enhance efficacy and safety in triple-negative breast cancer.

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn9857

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4. TGFBR2KO armored UCARTM1 shows resistance to inhibitory effects of TGFB1. (A) Schematic representation of the non-alloreactive CAR T cell with TRAC and TGFBR2 knockout with TALEN (UCARTM1∆TGFBR2). (B) Functional phenotyping of TGFBR2 knockout edited UCARTM1 compared to the unedited UCARTM1 via flow cytometry analysis of pSMAD2/3 staining in the presence of TGFB1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of CD25+ cells present in UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 following activation with MUC1 recombinant protein, in the presence or absence of TGFB1 (n = 2). Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired t test. (D) Proliferation assay for MUC1 recombinant protein activated UCARTM1 and UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 in the presence or absence of TGFB1 at days 0, 4, 6, 8, and 11 (n = 2 technical replicates per time point). Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA. (E) Design of in vivo experiment and individual tumor growth comparison of tumors treated intravenously with 5 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 4 to 5 per cohort) for donor 1. Experiment repeated with donor 2 is shown in the Supplementary Materials. Two- way ANOVA was performed for comparisons over time for tumor growth. (F) Design of in vivo experiment, individual tumor growth comparison of tumors, and (G) Kaplan- Meier survival analysis of cohorts treated intratumorally with 2 million UCARTM1∆TGFBR2 (n = 4), UCARTM1 (n = 4), NTD (n = 2), or PBS (n = 3). Each point represents a biological replicate for (E) to (G). Statistical significance was calculated using mixed-effects analysis comparisons over time for tumor growth and the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05. (H) TGFB1 ELISA analysis of HCC70-GFP tumors averaging 50 to 100, 250, 450, and 600 mm3 per mm3 of tumor (n = 2 to 6). Each point represents a biological replicate. Treatments were done using 2 × 106 or 5 × 106 CAR+ cells as indicated on each in vivo design.

    Article Snippet: IL- 12, IFNG, and TGFB1 ELISAs IL- 12 levels were measured with Quantikine ELISA Human IL- 12 p70 Immunoassay (R&D Systems, no. D1200) using 30 μl of blood.

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Functional Assay, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Activation Assay, Recombinant, Proliferation Assay, In Vivo, Comparison, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Fig. 5. PD1KO/IL-12KI and TGFBR2KO armored CAR T cells clear tumors within weeks without relapse with less CAR T cell expansion. (A) Schematic representation of the non- alloreactive CAR T cell with TRAC, PDCD1, and TGFBR2 knockouts and IL-12 knock-in. (B) Proliferation assay of MUC1 recombinant protein–activated UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12 and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2 with or without TGFB1 (n = 2 technical replicates per time point). Two-way ANOVA was performed for statistical significance over time. (C) Cytotoxic assay of T47D cells cocultured with NTD, UCARTM1, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2in the presence of TGFB1 with a 10-to-1 E:T ratio. CAR T cells were rechallenged after 24 hours (n = 3). Each point represents a technical replicate. Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired t test. (D) Design of in vivo experiment. (E) Tumor growth curve for cohorts intravenously treated with 5 million UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 5 to 6 per cohort) and (F) flow cytometry analysis of PB collected from all cohorts, 40 days after treatment for number and percent of hCD45+ cells. Two-way ANOVA was performed for comparisons for tumor growth, and ordinary one-way ANOVA was performed to determine the statistical significance for (F). (G) Color mapping of tumor clearance and inflammation in the mam- mary glands of UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12- and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2-treated cohorts (n = 5 and 6, consecutively) and representative dissection images of tumor cell injected (inj.) and no tumor cell injected mammary fat pad (MFP) (Control; Ctrl) of one animal each. (H) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of cohorts treated with UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 4 to 6 per cohort). Each point represents a biological replicate for (E) to (G). Statistical significance was calculated using the log-rank Mantel-Cox test in (H). *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.000, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05. All treatments were done using 5 × 106 CAR+ cells.

    Journal: Science advances

    Article Title: Multi-armored allogeneic MUC1 CAR T cells enhance efficacy and safety in triple-negative breast cancer.

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn9857

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 5. PD1KO/IL-12KI and TGFBR2KO armored CAR T cells clear tumors within weeks without relapse with less CAR T cell expansion. (A) Schematic representation of the non- alloreactive CAR T cell with TRAC, PDCD1, and TGFBR2 knockouts and IL-12 knock-in. (B) Proliferation assay of MUC1 recombinant protein–activated UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12 and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2 with or without TGFB1 (n = 2 technical replicates per time point). Two-way ANOVA was performed for statistical significance over time. (C) Cytotoxic assay of T47D cells cocultured with NTD, UCARTM1, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2in the presence of TGFB1 with a 10-to-1 E:T ratio. CAR T cells were rechallenged after 24 hours (n = 3). Each point represents a technical replicate. Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired t test. (D) Design of in vivo experiment. (E) Tumor growth curve for cohorts intravenously treated with 5 million UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 5 to 6 per cohort) and (F) flow cytometry analysis of PB collected from all cohorts, 40 days after treatment for number and percent of hCD45+ cells. Two-way ANOVA was performed for comparisons for tumor growth, and ordinary one-way ANOVA was performed to determine the statistical significance for (F). (G) Color mapping of tumor clearance and inflammation in the mam- mary glands of UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12- and UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2-treated cohorts (n = 5 and 6, consecutively) and representative dissection images of tumor cell injected (inj.) and no tumor cell injected mammary fat pad (MFP) (Control; Ctrl) of one animal each. (H) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of cohorts treated with UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12; ∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1∆PD1/IL12, UCARTM1∆TGFBR2, UCARTM1, NTD, or PBS (n = 4 to 6 per cohort). Each point represents a biological replicate for (E) to (G). Statistical significance was calculated using the log-rank Mantel-Cox test in (H). *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.000, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05. All treatments were done using 5 × 106 CAR+ cells.

    Article Snippet: IL- 12, IFNG, and TGFB1 ELISAs IL- 12 levels were measured with Quantikine ELISA Human IL- 12 p70 Immunoassay (R&D Systems, no. D1200) using 30 μl of blood.

    Techniques: Knock-In, Proliferation Assay, Recombinant, In Vivo, Flow Cytometry, Dissection, Injection, Control